Another lost season for baseball?
By Allen LaMountain
Assistant Sports Editor
alamountain@starhq.com
The current baseball season is unfolding with
some mild surprises, and some major ones as well, but will
we get to see it to its conclusion?
It looks doubtful right now as the Major League
Baseball Players Association has set an August date for a
walkout if the owners and MLBPA director Donald Fehr don't
come to a new collective bargaining agreement between players
and management.
Owners have vowed not to lock out the players
during the season, but the unspoken threat here is the cancellation
of the postseason once again. The first threat of ownership
was contraction, which has been at least temporarily shot
down, and thankfully permanently shot down in Minnesota.
For the Montreal Expos, and even possibly the
Florida Marlins however, contraction is still a very real
possibility.
Until June 6 that is, when an independent arbitrator
is expected to order MLB to abandon its contraction solution
altogether. But does that solve the problems that exist in
Major League Baseball? Not in the least.
MLB's problems go to the very core of something
that is all too human. Greed.
The players have it good and they know it. Why
should they make concessions to the owners after fighting
so hard for so long to get where they are today?
The owners argue that small revenue franchises
like Montreal, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh, Kansas City and Minnesota
are at a competitive disadvantage when compared with the likes
of the Dodgers, Red Sox and of course the Yankees.
The owners argue that the players union will
destroy any salary structure MLB attempts to put into place,
including a salary cap, which owners say is key to competitive
balance.
That the owners are their own worst enemy, and
have created the problem in the first place, seems to be of
no concern to them as they once again attempt to demand that
the players accept controls on salaries that the owners have
proven time and again that they are incapable of containing
themselves within.
And it isn't just the Yankees, although George
Steinbrenner has been at the forefront of the 'Spend to win'
congregation. Peter Angelos of Baltimore has spent more than
anyone over the last five years and what does he have to show
for it? A team that hasn't been over .500 in years and has
had to live off the glory of Cal Ripken, Jr's accomplishments.
Los Angeles has also stretched the salary structure,
with the mighty contract lavished upon Kevin Brown, who is
now disabled with elbow problems.
The owners need to realize that it's how you
spend your money that counts.
The Kansas City Royals were once a model franchise,
winners of a World Series championship and had a tradition
of being a team that built through the farm system. No longer.
The Milwaukee Brewers also had some shining moments
in the '80s with players like Robin Yount and Paul Molitor
keeping them in contention year in and year out, but now Selig
says they can't compete.
The answer is because the owners forgot about
the fundamentals of building a ballclub through the farm system.
Too many times owners of marginally talented teams have thought
that they were just one slugger, one pitcher or one closer
away from winning it all and roll the dice on a free agent
'savior,' only to see it collapse like a house of cards, with
fans staying away in droves.
The Red Sox have tried repeatedly through the
years to win this way, thinking that if they out-spent the
Yankees they would finally overtake the Yankees, only to fail
in that endeavor. The teams that succeed do so because they
have strong management that puts an emphasis on player development
and smart spending.
The Twins understand this and are starting to
reap the benefits of a strong farm system. The Twins right
now have second, third and fourth-year players, fresh from
the farm system, that are making their marks in the majors.
And at least two more on the way that will be with the big
club in the next year or two, including Michael Restovich
and Grant Balfour, who got their starts right here in Elizabethton.
The Kansas City Royals do not understand this,
as their farm system has failed to produce a major star since
Brett Saberhagen and Frank White. The Brewers also have seen
a major drought when it comes to home-grown prospects panning
out. Ditto Pittsburgh.
Dave Kindred wrote in The Sporting News
a column that quoted commissioner Bud Selig, when he said
of the Twins that, "Winning on the field doesn't solve their
problems".
But, ownership has pointed to that very thing
when they talk about competitive balance, and now they say
just the opposite.
It comes down -- for Selig, and those of a like
mind, wrote Kindred -- that it has nothing to do with competitive
balance, but rather it comes down to having 28 team owners
splitting revenue rather than 30.
I agree with Kindred's assessment of the situation.
The owners cannot defeat the beast that they
say is destroying them, because like the saying goes, "I have
seen the enemy and it is us." But that doesn't mean that they
aren't still going to try, and it is the fan who will suffer
for it.