Hussein caught, but public's safety
questionable, locals say
By Julie Fann
STAR STAFF
jfann@starhq.com
Saddam Hussein may be a defeated despot,
but some local residents feel his capture won't ensure that
Americans now live in a safer world. Though most believe the
snatching of Saddam was a moral victory for the U.S., they
also fear his followers may seek revenge.
"Of course I'm glad he's captured ... I don't
think we're safer now. I think he had too much of an influence,
and there were just too many people that were siding with
him. If he'd been stopped when he first became leader, maybe
- but not now," said Elizbethtonian Brenda Bennett, one of
16 whom the Star spoke with outside the U.S. Post Office on
Broad Street Monday afternoon.
While scouting out the location for the new Super
Wal-Mart slated for construction, Uriel Soto, a college student
who lives in Jackson, Tenn., lowered his map and pondered
the fallen dictator's fate.
"I feel really good because he was being a really
bad person, so I feel good. I think we're safer. Well, actually,
I don't think we're safer because there are still other people
who are going to follow him," he said.
John Elliott, who said he "most definitely" believes
Saddam's fall was necessary, said he's most concerned about
American troops. "I do believe good things are going to come
from it. I hope it's going to bring our troops home really.
And the 776 is a good start," he said.
On Sunday, Homeland Security Chief Tom Ridge
raised the country's terror alert to "high" and warned governors
and mayors to be vigilant in using increased security measures.
Immanuel Elliott, a 17-year-old student at Mars Hill College
in Mars Hill, N.C., said he believes terrorist activity and
Saddam Hussein don't bear much relationship to one another.
"Quite frankly, I don't think we're any safer
than we were before, and I never felt that there was a danger
in the first place. I guess I kind of felt that the government
was using Saddam as a scapegoat and basically blaming all
of our nation's problems on someone because we just needed
someone to blame. So, I don't really feel like much has changed,"
Elliott said.
Gene Shell said he was more fascinated by the
sheer strangeness of Hussein's capture by U.S. troops. "I
always wondered what a spider hole looked like. I'm glad we
caught him. I can't say we're safer, because Osama bin Laden
is still out there," he said.
Willett Ericson, a local teacher, said that,
in the long run, she believes Hussein's capture will be good
for the Iraqi people. However, as far as ensuring the safety
of Americans, she said his downfall didn't do much.
Comparing Hussein to Hitler, Randy Grindstaff
also said benevolent concern for the fate of the Iraqi people
justified Hussein's ousting. "What's the difference between
him and Hitler? They killed their own people. Murdered their
own kind. President Bush did a great thing. I wouldn't care
if he was a Democrat or a Republican ... Any man that stands
up for his country and defends his people, what can you say?
Can you argue with him?," he said.
And one elderly gentleman, who chose to remain
anonymous, had an interesting answer to the question, "How
do you feel about Saddam Hussein's capture?"
"Saddam Hussein? He's my brother," he said.