Engineer says down blending uranium is
needed, but so is heavy oversight
By Thomas Wilson
STAR STAFF
twilson@starhq.com
JOHNSON CITY -- A nuclear physicist believes
downblending bomb-grade uranium is a necessary project to
eliminate weapons stockpiles, but warns a community must be
actively involved in monitoring the process.
Dr. Arjun Makhijani, president of the Institute
for Energy and Environmental Research in Washington, discussed
called nuclear materials and the "BLEU Project" of Nuclear
Fuel Services in Erwin at a free lecture held at East Tennessee
State University on Sunday night.
"This is a project that needs to be done, and
it has a poor characteristic for the community where it is
to be done," Makhijani told an audience of approximately 30
people. "It should not be accepted by any community without
very stringent safeguards."
He said remnants of the Cold War arms race included
massive stockpiles of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium that
would remain radioactive and hazardous for thousands of years
to come.
The BLEU project is part of a U.S Department
of Energy program to reduce stockpiles of surplus highly enriched,
weapons-grade uranium (HEU) through reuse or disposal as radioactive
waste. The BLEU Project takes a weapons-usable form of uranium
and blends it with natural uranium to make low enriched uranium
(LEU), which cannot be used in weapons. The LEU is shipped
to NFS, which will prepare it for fabrication into a fuel
for use in Tennessee Valley Authority's Browns Ferry reactors,
according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
Beginning with the nuclear age during the latter
stages of World War II, nuclear secrets had become the most
guarded for any nation. Makhijani likened the nuclear age
to a type of secular priesthood that kept the secrets of nuclear
materials and weapons.
The Cold War sent the United States and the Soviet
Union into a massive nuclear weapons build up with thousands
of metric tons worth of HEU topping warheads at strategic
points around the globe. "It was kind of like a nuclear Viagra
race," Makhijani quipped.
When the Cold War ended in the early 1990s, both
countries were essentially left with massive stockpiles of
HEU and no place to blow up.
Environmental groups and a private citizen have
filed petitions in response to the first two license amendment
requests that NFS has filed in connection with the BLEU project.
The petitions asked the NRC to conduct a full environmental
impact statement on the BLEU project and to hold a public
hearing on the matter in Northeast Tennessee before allowing
NFS to implement the project.
Administrative Judge Alan S. Rosenthal of the
U.S. Atomic Safety Board has delayed a ruling on the petitions
until after the third license amendment request is filed by
NFS.
Makhijani said Russia had released approximately
500 tons of surplus weapons grade uranium after the end of
the Cold War. The former nemesis of the United States had
been down blending uranium for some time. "This job is being
done in Russia," he said.
An environmental assessment in October by NRC
reported a finding of no significant impact from a proposed
BLEU preparation facility at the NFS site in Erwin. NRC approved
a license amendment to allow NFS to possess and use Special
Nuclear Material at the newly constructed uranyl nitrate building
on its Erwin complex.
In the second amendment request, filed last October,
NFS is seeking NRC permission to begin processing operations
at an existing building within the protected area of its Erwin
site. The company has not yet formally applied for the third
license amendment, which will be for an oxide conversion facility.
Makhijani said the nation's dependence on nuclear
reactors for electricity made nuclear power a standard for
the foreseeable future. He cited the recent blackout in July
that left millions in the Northeast without power as an example
of the nation's convergent power grid relied on by each power-providing
structure to remain alive.
"It is a fact of life that we can't switch off
these power plants," said Makhijani who received his Ph.D.
in engineering with a specialty in nuclear fusion from the
University of California at Berkeley.
The Department of Energy performed an environmental
impact statement regarding the BLEU Project process in 1996.
The TVA reviewed the EIS and issued its own Record of Decision
on the project in 2000, thus validating the EIS conclusions.
In July 2002, the NRC issued an environmental assessment following
review by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Tennessee Historical
Commission.
An "honest" EIS was "hard to come by", according
to Makhijani, who said each community where a potential uranium
downblending process was proposed must advocate the most accurate
EIS possible.
"Before a downblend should be done, it is the
obligation of the government to do a proper EIS," he said.
Makhijani faulted the nuclear establishment of the government
for failing to provide answers and safety to the public during
the 1940s and 1950s when nuclear energy was touted as a clean,
safe energy source.
Makhijani recommended a trust account funded
by both the government and any corporation involved in a downblend
project be established that was independent of either's control.
The account could serve as a regulatory resource for the community
where the process was occurring for years to come.