Reapportionment committee adopts
new plans
By Stephen S. Glass
Star Staff
In a divided vote Tuesday night, a redistricting
plan adopted last month by the Carter County Reapportionment
Committee was rescinded, and two new plans were adopted for
consideration by the county commission.
The scrapped plan would have reduced the number
of county commissioners from 24 to 15. The same plan would
have cut the number of constables serving the county to five.
Committee members had also hoped to reduce the number of school
board members from seven to five.
Most of the county's constables were present
at last night's meeting to plead with the committee not to
cut their positions.
"I don't understand why you would want to cut
the number of constables," said 8th District Constable Bob
Carroll. "Constables give the county extra law enforcement,
and we don't cost the county a dime."
There are currently 16 constables serving Carter
County. However, a state law adopted by the general assembly
in 1978 allows for only half as many constables as county
commissioners in a given county. By law, no county can have
more than 25 commissioners and 12 constables. Carter County
lawmakers were not made aware of the law until this year,
yet they are bound to comply, said County Attorney George
Dugger.
"If we have to go to 12, then we'll go to 12,"
said Carroll. "But whatever you do, please don't cut us all
the way back to five." Carroll said that he spends as much
as $7,000 per year out of his own pocket to serve his district
and that other constables do the same for their own.
"I buy my own uniforms, pay for my own car, my
own gas and oil. None of that costs the county anything. But
we are out there providing services that free up regular law
enforcement to do their jobs."
Sheriff John Henson also spoke on behalf of the
constables.
"These guys have the same training as my deputies,
and I don't know what we would do without them," Henson said.
"They always cooperate with the sheriff's department. I can
call on any one of these guys day or night, and they'll do
anything we need them to do."
Swayed by the constables' arguments, Committee
Member Charlie Bayless called to rescind the five-district
plan and motioned for a vote on a new plan that may allow
the county to keep eight districts and 24 commissioners. The
eight-district plan, along with a number of others, was drawn
up by County Executive Truman Clark earlier this month.
In a 5-3 vote, the committee chose to present
the full commission with an eight-district plan.
That plan, however, is not without quirks and
must first be reviewed by State Planner Albert Teilhet.
The new plan would require shuffling some voting
precincts into other districts. Unaka and Midway would be
joined with Hampton, Little Milligan and Elk Mills. The Hunter
Precinct would be moved into the Courthouse District.
Teilhet said is uncertain whether Unaka and Little
Milligan touch on the state's maps. If not, the committee
will have to resort to some other plan, he said.
Commissioner Buford Peters was angered by the
new eight-district plan. Peters represents Stoney Creek and
would likely lose some of his constituency in the shuffle.
"There's not even a road that connects Hampton
and Stoney Creek," Peters said. "This is the most ridiculous
thing I've ever heard."
"If you have a better plan, we'd like to see
it," countered Clark.
Peters said that the committee had a good plan
with five districts but they chose to throw it away.
Following the meeting, Peters and Clark exchanged
hot words. Peters accused Clark of drawing up the new plan
for "political reasons."
"You can think whatever you like," said Clark,
who is set to retire next year.
The committee also chose to keep the present
number of education districts and school board members and
suggested that constables meet with Clark and the county attorney
to discuss new districts for them. Changing the number of
education precincts would require a private act by the state,
Dugger said.
Assistant Administrator of Elections Laura Holtsclaw
said that having separate districts for constables, school
board members, and commissioners will lead to confusion among
voters and election officials.
"There will have to be 21 different ballots for
every election," said Holtsclaw, who pleaded to no avail with
the committee to adopt a plan that would be "simple and logical."
Charlie Bayless, Bill Armstrong, Brad Green,
Harry Sisk and Wayne Holtsclaw voted for the plans. Phil Nave,
Jeff Treadway and Ted Weaver voted against the plans.