Greeneville actress takes on tough
new role: Challenging NFS
By Kathy Helms-Hughes
STAR STAFF
khughes@starhq.com
(Part 1 of two-part series)
She's no dumb blonde.
Park Overall. The sharp-tongued Appalachian nurse
"Laverne" who performed opposite Richard Mulligan on the NBC
comedy "Empty Nest" has a new role: Crusader against Nuclear
Fuel Services Inc.'s "BLEU Project," or Blended Low Enriched
Uranium for those who hate acronyms.
NFS was subcontracted by the Framatome ANP consortium,
of which it is a member, to down-blend 33 metric tons of bomb-grade
uranium into low-enriched fuel for Tennessee Valley Authority's
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant.
Overall, through Washington attorney Diane Curran,
filed a petition Aug. 8 seeking a hearing before the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission on behalf of herself and four environmental
groups -- the State of Franklin Group/Sierra Club, Friends
of the Nolichucky River Valley Inc., Oak Ridge Environmental
Peace Alliance and Tennessee Environmental Council.
Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League and 15
Northeast Tennessee residents also requested a hearing. All
claimed they should have a say in whether the project proceeds
because of potential impacts to their health, drinking water,
property values and the environment.
In the early 1990s, the Greeneville actress brought
attention to what she calls the "tragedy of the Pigeon River"
after publicizing pollution emitted from the Champion paper
mill in Canton, N.C. Since that time, the paper mill has evolved
into an employee-run facility and employees have worked with
the community to reduce pollution.
Economics
NFS manufactures uranium fuel for use in U.S.
Navy submarines and performs uranium processing, purification
and recovery services for the Department of Energy and commercial
entities.
The BLEU Project would be financially beneficial
to the Department of Energy, which would spend less than if
it had to dispose of the surplus high-enriched uranium, and
TVA would pay less for fuel.
According to NFS spokesman Tony Treadway, the
TVA project involves about $150 million. "That includes the
work and construction of an NFS down-blending operation inside
the plant and the new Framatome conversion facility outside
the fence of NFS."
Overall claims the difference in NFS making fuel
for Navy submarines and down-blending uranium for Browns Ferry
boils down to dollars and cents. "This expansion is not to
do with 'God, America, and Apple Pie.' This expansion is to
do with profit. And that profit is not going to be shared
with the people of East Tennessee.
"This is about flooding the market with foreign
uranium. NFS's own union workers, if they would care to check
the Environmental Impact Statement prepared by DOE, is against
this. Even LES (Louisiana Energy Services) was against it,
according to the draft comments," she said.
Environmental impact
Overall noted that NRC's Environmental Assessment
(EA), which was based on information prepared by NFS, states:
"Current environmental monitoring stations do not provide
adequate coverage of the expanded site area for the BLEU Complex.
In addition, the current monitoring program lacks adequate
coverage for groundwater in the vicinity of the BLEU complex."
She said the EA goes on to say, "Under the proposed
action both uranium and thorium air emissions are expected
to increase by a factor of 4 to 5 times current levels ...
The long site history has resulted in some areas of the site,
including groundwater, becoming contaminated with radiological
and chemical constituents."
On Aug. 3, 2000, NFS notified the NRC that it
had possibly exceeded its annual effluent discharge limits
in the month of May and had shut down its Waste Water Treatment
Facility until an NRC inspection team could determine whether
it had violated its license.
In order to prevent shutdown of the processing
facility, NFS submitted an application to NRC on Aug. 9, 2000,
requesting an "expedited amendment" to its Special Nuclear
Material license from concentration-based levels to dose-based
levels so that it would not be in violation of its license.
NRC granted the amendment on Oct. 27 allowing NFS to adjust
its liquid effluent discharge action levels.
NFS also submitted a license amendment request
in April 2002 for its North Site Decommissioning Project after
problems developed during cleanup of its Radiological Burial
Ground. "Due to the high groundwater table in this area, the
floor of the excavation can be under as much as 4 feet of
water. Though the water from the area is pumped out of the
excavation 16 hours a day for days at a time, the water is
continually replaced by groundwater ..." the document states.
Overall said East Tennesseans should note NFS's
attorneys in Washington "have asked the NRC to deny standing
to petitioners with cancer, with children in the school near
NFS, anyone who takes their water from the Nolichucky, anyone
who lives on the river -- in fact, to everyone who asked for
a fair and open hearing. We are confident they will not be
successful," she said.
"I would like to alert NFS that we are not new
to environmental justice. We are experienced, educated, and
concerned individuals which make up respected groups that
have funding and experienced legal counsel. Let us have an
honest and open dialogue."
Overall said NFS attorneys also claimed that
petitioner David Byrd of Unicoi, who has cancer, lacked standing.
"Mr. Byrd said, 'I live downwind from NFS. I don't want to
breathe polluted air that is any worse than what it already
is. I have a choice about cigarette smoke, but I would not
have a chance to get away from this.'
"They said 'Mr. Byrd's only injury is an existing
cancer which could not possibly be related to the proposed
license amendment.'"
Overall said high groundwater concentrations
of uranium and technetium-99 have been identified at NFS and
some is now being found outside plant boundaries.
NFS responded to petitioners' objections with
a press release. Overall said, "I was surprised to find that
they admit so much groundwater contamination, but Tony Treadway
[NFS spokesperson] states that there is no threat to the river.
He does not discuss the uranium and thorium NFS will be putting
into the air.
"I would really like to play chess with someone
who has read his own material. I would like for them to put
forward someone that can legitimately discuss the dangers
that they have written themselves in their own Environmental
Assessment."
Overall said petitioners have been unable to
locate a site-specific environmental report for the BLEU project.
Petitioners found a June 1996 Environmental Impact Statement
done by the Department of Energy before NFS was selected as
the final site for the down-blending project.
"We have the EIS, but it is mysteriously missing
three pages relevant to NFS. We could not get the public comments
[a separate document]. In order for anyone to get the entire
EIS you have to petition the NRC under the Freedom of Information
Act. However, the NRC in Oak Ridge 'can't lend it out,' 'couldn't
find it,' or 'will let you read it now that they've found
it, but you can't make copies.' More maddening is to research
these documents on ADAMS," where information is made available
to the public.
"In light of these and other problems identified
at the site," Overall said, "If NFS and the NRC are so concerned
about our safety, why are they dodging a bona fide Environmental
Impact Statement?"