Court of Appeals deals Wellmont
another setback
By Thomas Wilson
STAR STAFF
twilson@starhq.com
The Tennessee Court of Appeals has upheld a lower-court
ruling that vacated the Certificate of Need (CON) granted
to the Kingsport-based Wellmont Health System in 2000 permitting
the health care system to build a new hospital in Washington
County.
Issued Friday, Judge Frank G. Clement Jr. delivered
the opinion of the court, which ruled a conflict-of-interest
situation existed on the part of one member of the Health
Facilities Commission, which granted the CON to Wellmont over
three years ago. In rendering its decision, the Court supported
the findings of both an Administrative Law Judge and Chancellor
Carol L. McCoy of Davidson County to vacate Wellmont's Certificate
of Need.
On July 13, 2000, Wellmont applied for a Certificate
of Need to build and operate a for-profit hospital in Johnson
City. The proposed facility would be an acute care facility
providing emergency care. In its application, Wellmont asserted
that additional hospital capacity is needed in Washington
County based on reports showing emergency room waits, delays
in scheduling surgical and diagnostic procedures and the unavailability
of hospital beds.
The proposed new hospital stirred staunch opposition
from Mountain States Health Alliance, which owns four health
care facilities in Washington County including Johnson City
Medical Center Hospital, North Side Hospital and Johnson City
Specialty Hospital.
After taking evidence and hearing arguments of
counsel, the Commission voted 5-4 in November of 2000 granting
Wellmont's application for the CON. The Commission's chairperson
abstained from the vote. Commissioner Charles Mann voted with
the majority in favor of granting the Certificate of Need.
During previous court, Mountain States Health
Alliance presented evidence that established Mann as the principal
owner, officer and director of Specialty Surgical Instruments
(SSI) and that SSI sells surgical instruments to hospitals
and other health care providers in Tennessee. More specific
to this case, Mountain States presented evidence that SSI
sold over $450,000 to Wellmont from fiscal year 1997 through
June 6, 2001, and alleged that Mann would likely sell even
more equipment to Wellmont if another hospital were opened.
Mountain States also introduced evidence showing that SSI
sold $158,000 to Mountain States in the year 2000, bringing
the total sales by SSI to more than one-half million dollars
for the period.
In its opinion, the Court of Appeals rules, "The
record is clear that Commissioner Mann and/or SSI had a substantial
relationship with Wellmont during the four years leading up
to the vote. Specifically, the record shows that SSI had sales
to Wellmont of approximately $456,810 from 1997 through June
of 2001." The appellate court cited a separate legal precedent
of a lower court's finding that Mann had a "disqualifying
pecuniary conflict of interest" based on sales to Methodist
of approximately $405,093, which occurred prior to the vote.
The Court of Appeals ruled that Mann had an affirmative
duty to inform the Commission of his conflict of interest
and to recuse himself and his vote to approve the CON was
void. Based on the ruling that Mann's vote was void, the Court
ruled that the vote of the eligible commissioners voting was
four to four, being a tie vote, which constitutes a decision
by the Commission denying Wellmont's CON application.
The ruling issued Friday is the result of a three-year
court battle that stemmed from flaws in Tennessee's previous
CON process. The latest ruling comes as the third setback
for Wellmont.
"The courts have continued to validate our position
that the CON should have never been awarded," said MSHA President
and CEO Dennis Vonderfecht in a statement released Friday.
"This is the third consecutive court ruling that supports
our position."
Despite the ruling, Wellmont officials also announced
Friday that they were not giving up. The health system's plan
to file a new CON application for its proposed Johnson City
hospital by the end of the first quarter remains on track,
according to Wellmont Senior Vice President of Marketing and
Communications Tim Baylor.
"This latest ruling by the Court of Appeals is
the product of an unwieldy, outdated CON system," Baylor said.
"Thankfully, the state legislature has enacted major reforms
that have completely reshaped the CON approval and appeals
process."