City faces new cuts as state retreats
By Thomas Wilson
STAR STAFF
twilson@starhq.com
The City of Elizabethton stands to lose $275,000
of state shared tax revenues if Gov. Phil Bredesen follows
through on a proposal to reduce state shared moneys up to
$165 million this year.
It is not welcomed news following the 13 percent
cut to the city's budget last year.
"This budget, if not the hardest, is the most
challenging of any we speak of today that I've seen in my
20 years of city government," said Charles Stahl, City Manager
of Elizabethton.
The city stands to lose approximately $275,000
this year if Bredesen's next budget includes a promised cut
in state shared taxes that typically go to cities and counties
across the state. The Associated Press reported Monday that
Bredesen had said state shared taxes to cities and counties
would be reduced next year.
Bredesen administration officials said last week
they had proposed to keep more than $100 million in state
shared taxes for the state's use.
Nashville-based lobby group the Tennessee Municipal
League (TML) alerted cities that state shared taxes could
result in significant cuts to revenues for the coming fiscal
year.
The reduction would mean a $50 million cut in
the Hall income tax and $56 million in other state-shared
tax revenues to cities and counties, according to figures
from the TML.
The governor's budget was also to include a potential
$42 million cut in grant programs to provide funding for a
city's infrastructure, public safety and public works projects.
The city's 2003 fiscal year budget approved by the City Council
last year was slashed 13 percent from the previous year.
"State shared revenues fund government operations
of the city such as the fire department, police department,
and public works," said Stahl. "Before we were cutting capital
... now we are getting into programs."
State shared revenues are appropriated into the
city's general fund budget. Those revenues also fund discretionary
appropriations to the Carter County Health Dept., American
Red Cross, Senior Citizens Center, and the Shepherd's Inn
domestic violence shelter.
Stahl said it was premature to discuss potential
cuts of personnel or services until the state's budget picture
became more clear. He also said the budget he presented to
the council would not have any recommendation for an increase
in property taxes. He said he expected to present the 2004
city budget to the council by April 1.
He also said that more proposed reductions in
state funding came as no surprise given the previous administration
and legislature's battles with funding state services.
"This is something that is not surprising to
me," Stahl said. "It is certainly not something I would have
looked forward to by any means."
The state reportedly faces a $480 million deficit
in the fiscal year ending in June, and an estimated $780 million
shortfall for fiscal 2004, according to state revenue reports.
The governor has also asked commissioners of
all state departments to slice their operating budgets by
up to 9 percent for the coming year.
Reduced state grant money would limit the city's
ability to fund new and ongoing projects such as the Linear
Path walkway and traffic signalization projects around town.
Stahl said a reduction in grants could freeze
bridge rehabilitation funding for the Elk Avenue Bridge and
even the Covered Bridge.
Another financial blow suffered by local governments
was the low yield on investment income from city revenues.
Low interest rates set by the Federal Reserve translated to
low interest yields on city dollars, Stahl said. He also said
that while larger municipalities could delay immediate impact
of cut shared revenues, the city's current budget situation
made a new state cut in revenues an immediate problem.
"We don't have the luxury of deferring the problem,"
he said.